ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Utilising non-invasive measurement methods for the inventory of endangered cultural heritage -case study of Iraq
,
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Biology, College of Education for Pure Sciences, Tikrit University, Iraq
 
2
Department of Chemical Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Babylon, Iraq
 
 
Publication date: 2023-09-30
 
 
Journal of Modern Technologies for Cultural Heritage Preservation 2023;2(3)
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Advanced non-invasive remote sensing techniques, in conjunction with advanced digital technologies designed for the acquisition and comprehensive analysis of extensive datasets, hold substantial promise for significantly augmenting the capacities associated with the documentation of cultural heritage sites. This is especially crucial when it comes to preserving endangered cultural heritage. The main goal of this article was to demonstrate instances of non-invasive approaches used to catalog cultural heritage objectes and locations in Iraq. This investigation showcased a number of examples and employed a variety of contemporary data collection and processing techniques. These included digital close-range photogrammetry, Building Information Modeling (BIM), data from crowdsourced data, and findings derived from Mosul Project. As evident, reality underscores the presence of numerous perils endangering the preservation of tangible cultural heritage sites worldwide. Precious architectural marvels, artistic creations, and natural landmarks are at risk of permanent loss. Therefore, a prompt inventory process, along with the creation of precise digital models, ensures the protection, rescue, and potential reconstruction of these invaluable entities. The instances provided in this article, proved that the application of different digitization methods to Iraq's cultural heritage, can readily serve as a model for other endangered objects and sites.
 
REFERENCES (17)
1.
Kuzyk, Z. The use of modern measurement methods in the inventory of endangered cultural heritage objects in Lviv. 2023.
 
2.
Stylianidis, E. CIPA - Heritage Documentation: 50 Years: Looking Backwards. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2019, XLII-2/W14, 1–130, doi:10.5194/isprs-archives- XLII-2-W14-1-2019.
 
3.
Tobiasz; Markiewicz; Łapiński; Nikel; Kot; Muradov Review of Methods for Documentation, Management, and Sustainability of Cultural Heritage. Case Study: Museum of King Jan III’s Palace at Wilanów. Sustainability 2019, 11, 7046, doi:10.3390/su11247046.
 
4.
Chicago, T.U. of No Title Available online: https://isac.uchicago.edu/muse...- exhibits/catastrophe-ten-years-later.
 
5.
Nations, U.; Rapporteur, S. The Intentional Destruction of Cultural Heritage in Iraq as a Violation of Human Rights.
 
6.
Markiewicz, J.; Tobiasz, A.; Kot, P.; Muradov, M.; Shaw, A.; Al-Shammaa, A. Review of Surveying Devices for Structural Health Monitoring of Cultural Heritage Buildings. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Developments in eSystems Engineering (DeSE); IEEE, 2019; pp. 597–601.
 
7.
Markiewicz, J.S.; Kowalczyk, M.; Zawieska, D. The analysis of factors which affect on the terrestrial laser scanning data registration accuracy. In Proceedings of the International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference Surveying Geology and Mining Ecology Management, SGEM; 2015; Vol. 1.
 
8.
Muradov, M.; Kot, P.; Markiewicz, J.; Łapiński, S.; Tobiasz, A.; Onisk, K.; Shaw, A.; Hashim, K.; Zawieska, D.; Mohi-Ud-Din, G. Non destructive system for in-wall moisture assessment of cultural heritage buildings. Meas. J. Int. Meas. Confed. 2022, 203, doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111930.
 
9.
Markiewicz, J.; Górecka, K.; Zawieska, D.; Zieliński, M.; Łapiński, S.; Kot, P. THE INTEGRATION OF THE MULTI-TEMPORAL CONSERVATION WORKS AND NON- INVASIVE MEASUREMENTS. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2022, XLVI-2/W1-, 343–349, doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVI-2-W1-2022-343-2022.
 
10.
Markiewicz, J.; Łapiński, S.; Kot, P.; Tobiasz, A.; Muradov, M.; Nikel, J.; Shaw, A.; Al- Shamma’a, A. The quality assessment of different geolocalisation methods for a sensor system to monitor structural health of monumental objects. Sensors (Switzerland) 2020, doi:10.3390/s20102915.
 
11.
Giżyńska, J.; Komorowska, E.; Kowalczyk, M. The comparison of photogrammetric and terrestrial laser scanning methods in the documentation of small cultural heritage object – case study. 2022.
 
12.
Doroszuk, K.; Markiewicz, J. The possibility of using close-range photogrammetry in the inventory of historic complex basements - case study. Sensors Mach. Learn. Appl. 2022, 1, doi:10.55627/smla.001.02.0014.
 
13.
Rekrei Rekrei Available online: https://rekrei.org.
 
14.
Lopez-Gonzalez, L.; Otero de Cosca, R.; Gomez-Heras, M.; Garcia-Morales, S. A 4D GIS methodology to study variations in evaporation points on a heritage building. Environ. Earth Sci. 2016, 75, 1113, doi:10.1007/s12665-016-5907-8.
 
15.
He, J.; Liu, J.; Xu, S.; Wu, C.; Zhang, J. A GIS-Based Cultural Heritage Study Framework on Continuous Scales: A Case Study on 19th Century Military Industrial Heritage. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2015, XL-5/W7, 215–222, doi:10.5194/isprsarchives- XL-5-W7-215-2015.
 
16.
Al-Muqdadi, F.; Ahmed, A. APPLYING HERITAGE BUILDING INFORMATION MODELLING (HBIM) TO LOST HERITAGE IN CONFLICT ZONES: AL-HADBA’ MINARET IN MOSUL, IRAQ. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2022, XLIII-B2-2, 753–760, doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2022-753-2022.
 
17.
Abed, F.M.; Mohammed, M.U.; Mohammed, M.U.; Kadhim, S.J. Architectural and Cultural Heritage conservation using low-cost cameras. Appl. Res. J. 2017, 3, 376–384.
 
 
CITATIONS (1):
1.
The possibility of using spherical images in the inventory of cultural heritage - the case of the Royal Castle earthwork
Natalia Styś, Jakub Kuszyk
Journal of Modern Technologies for Cultural Heritage Preservation
 
eISSN:2753-4146
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top